Evaluation of a Diagnostic Reasoning Program (DxR): Exploring Student Perceptions and Addressing Faculty Concerns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5334/1998-1Keywords:
problem solving, pilot evaluation, medical education, clinical reasoning,Abstract
Abstract: Clinical reasoning is essentially a problem-solving process, in which medical students must learn to gather and interpret data, generate hypotheses and make decisions. To develop skills in problem-solving it is argued that students need more tools, rather than more answers (Masys, 1989). DxR is a computerised case series, in which students use 'doctor tools' to investigate a patient problem. This report describes a pilot evaluation of DxR in fourth year medicine at the University of Sydney. It addresses faculty concerns regarding the program, explores student perceptions, and looks at the capacity of the program to stimulate and support the development of clinical reasoning skills. It finally discusses possibilities for using DxR to support learning in medicine.
Reviewers: Stig Andersen (Virtual Centre for Health Informatics, Aalborg, DK), David Good (U. Cambridge), Timothy Koschmann (U. Colorado)
Interactive elements: Details are provided for obtaining a DxR demonstration CD.
DxR is distributed by NOVARTIS, although the DxR cases described in this article are not the same as those listed in the
Diagnosis category of their bookshop/website. A Macromedia Director demonstration of DxR can be obtained by contacting Tanaya Patel, Project Director,
DxR Development Group (tanaya.patel@dxrgroup.com). Alternatively, a demonstration CD, and complimentary catalogue of patient cases and price list can be obtained by calling 800-631-1181 (USA).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1998 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms (if a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s)):
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.
Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License